Countdown

  • Beginning of Afghan War:
    8 years, 9 months, 22 days, 16 hours, 17 minutes ago
  • Mission Accomplished in Iraq:
    7 years, 2 months, 28 days, 16 hours, 17 minutes ago
  • 2010 Elections:
    in 3 months, 3 days, 7 hours, 42 minutes
  • 2012 Elections:
    in 2 years, 3 months, 7 days, 7 hours, 42 minutes

 

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT

Obama Offers Fixed Targets for US Emissions Cuts

18:44 25 November 2009 by Jim Giles

President Barack Obama has given a major boost to next month’s UN climate change negotiations in Copenhagen by offering firm targets for cuts in US greenhouse gas emissions. The move, announced today, has been widely welcomed by climate change campaigners. But although they may seem generous, the proposed targets are in fact far from what developing nations and climate scientists have called for.

Obama said the US was prepared to cut its emissions of greenhouse gases by 17 per cent by 2020 and by 83 per cent by 2050 “in the context of an overall deal in Copenhagen that includes robust mitigation contributions from China and the other emerging economies”.

At first glance, that sounds similar to commitments made by other wealthy nations. The European Union, for instance, is aiming to cut its emissions by 20 per cent cut by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050. But the US president is measuring his cuts against 2005 emissions; most other nations use 1990 as a baseline.

The difference is subtle but significant: US emissions grew by almost 15 per cent between those dates. Using 1990 as a baseline, Obama’s pledge translates into a cut of around 4 per cent.

That is well short of the 25 to 40 per cent cuts that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says are required from developed nations to avoid the most dangerous consequences of climate change.

More cuts may come

The US may, however, achieve bigger cuts than Obama’s statement makes apparent. It is likely that the pledge relates to a scheme to limit emissions from specific industries, such as the energy sector. Alexia Kelly, a climate policy expert at the World Resources Institute in Washington DC, points out that other domestic policies, such improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency, will bring further reductions.

Read more at Newscientist

SociBook del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon
Twitter It!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

BAD NEWS